This happened.
2026-08-09 08:44
File
2CA40B09-1EE1-42F5-AABC-32CA2176C002.png
2037479 bytes · image/png
Source file is paid and locked. Collecting requires payment of $5.99.
Claim
I published Harmonic Resonance Computing first: name, architecture, frequency over binary. Months later came papers using the same paradigm. Now Google uses the later literature to explain HRC while my original work sits beneath it. Put the dates back. The inversion ends. Link https://bjklock.com/p/61a73fc9-3f0c-4cde-b89b-2e79cccff98e
Ownership provenance
Proof-boundNo ownership transfers have been appended.
Record data
712B114E13551378Authorship
PBI_VERIFIEDEmail: bjklock.com@gmail.com
362273997ba9d0e085c3cfbfabbdfc3851c006fff8e5e34809be65977c5518b28e3cbda5c7494213f7104fbe0f093bb1d9082135085aec2d92ff9a66a03c5b7dZero-knowledge proof
What it means: the issued code, pulse, and timestamp are bound to this proof. If any field is changed, verification fails.
Technical: fields are committed with Poseidon, then validated with a Groth16 proof for fast public verification.
- Circuit
Groth16Proof system used for verification.
5469324E97FA3702Proof identifier for this claim. Verifies quickly and deterministically.
0ce644f70852329019e6368d55aebb27e301162454750f08a698bd7a01571afcHash commitment that binds the committed fields into the proof.
Practical rule: if it looks the same but isn’t the same, it won’t verify.
